Secs In the City - Reviews & Ratings | Rate My Teaching Agency

About Secs In the City

Is this your agency?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Maecenas porttitor congue massa. Fusce posuere, magna sed pulvinar ultricies, purus lectus malesuada libero, sit amet commodo magna eros quis urna.

Nunc viverra imperdiet enim. Fusce est. Vivamus a tellus.

Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Proin pharetra nonummy pede. Mauris et orci.

Etiam eget dui. Aliquam erat volutpat. Sed at lorem in nunc porta tristique.
Aenean nec lorem. In porttitor. Donec laoreet nonummy augue.
Donec blandit feugiat ligula.

Please note these are not real details for this agency!

Contact Secs In the City

01234 567890

mail@example.com

123 Acacia Avenue
London
E17 1QW

Secs In the City

Secs In the City Ratings and Reviews

Overall Rating

out of 10

based on 0 Ratings

Rate This Agency

Amount of work

Rate of pay

Quality of placement

Personability

Honesty

Overall Service

Leave Your Review and Rating Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Review

Name *

Email *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Ratings*

Amount of work *

Rate of pay *

Quality of placement *

Personability *

Honesty *

Overall Service *

Please check this box to agree to our

Review Guidelines

To maintain the integrity, relevance, and fairness of reviews at Rate My Temp Agency, the following review guidelines have been put into place.

All Rate My Temp Agency reviews must meet the standards below:

Professionalism, we adhere to strict code of professionalism. RMTA would like candidates to uphold this professionalism in their agency reviews. No profanity, threats, prejudice, sexual, or otherwise unprofessional language and a respect for individual anonymity. While constructive criticism of agencies is welcomed, please refrain from naming individual consultants in a negative light.

Please be aware that reviewers may review one agency only once, if it is found that you have reviewed an agency more than once your reviews will be deleted and you will not be allowed to use the site again. Reviewers must have worked for or be working for any agencies they review and if requested proof of work undertaken will be requested by RMTA such as a payslip or any correspondence alighting to work undertaken between the agency and the reviewer. All reviews should be unique and informative, reviewers should base their review on their own personal experience and write with the intent of informing others.

Conflict of Interest:

Reviews should only be written by agency workers and not by agency employees.
Agencies should not write reviews about themselves or their competitors.
Reviews should be honest and unbiased, relevant and on-topic
Reviews should contain content that is relevant and informative to other readers.
Reviews are not a place for personal attacks or rants.
Reviews should not be used as a place to ask questions or direct comments towards the agency. Please contact them directly for these enquiries.
Reviews should not be used as a place to ask questions or direct comments towards Rate My Temp Agency, ensure you use the Contact form for these enquiries.
Reviews should not contain advertising or spam.
Reviewers must have a valid e-mail address or the review will be deleted
The e-mail address associated with your review must be authentic. We may need to contact you if there is a problem with your review.
Due to the nature of the agency worker-agency relationship, Rate My Temp Agency respects the anonymity of our users. We will never reveal your e-mail address.

Lastly…

Rate My Temp Agency reserves the right to remove a review at any time for any reason.

The reviews posted on Rate My Temp Agency are the opinions of the individual reviewer and not those of Rate My Temp Agency. We do not endorse any of the opinions by our reviewers. If there is any doubt with regards the authenticity of the rating/review we will remove the rating and seek evidence from the reviewer that the reviewer has undertaken paid work by the reviewed agency.